

RPGamer wrote:Could we see a Mana game for the Nintendo Wii?
Kouichi Ishii: That idea is currently being considered, with a lot of forward momentum. In general, I feel there is a great amount of possibility on the Wii, as it presents tremendous potential.
I thought about the FF-CT comparison last night. Then I realized, FF changed genres. It's no longer a standard turn based RPG. I'm not entirely sure, but I know things were changed around a lot. Plus CT has a weird gimmick with the Dual Techs and Triple Techs making an emphasis on team attacks. Of course, such a feature would need to be expanded greatly, and if they wanted to go the Chrono Cross route, they could make it have a good 30 characters to choose from instead of CT's 7 or whatever.Hawk wrote:Your saying mana games don’t have much future because kh is also an action RPG, but you are saying that Chrono Triger has more chance of getting a new game, which doesn’t make sense because Chrono Triger is the same type of game as final fantasy which is more famous than kh.
Don't say that. Final Fantasy is slowly getting worse and that statement there shows that they want Final Fantasy to be horrible.nick912012 wrote: In a sense, Final Fantasy is trying to innovate itself, and I don't see it moving back to the traditional turn based system.
Well, if Final Fantasy goes back to its old format, what's the point of having Dragon Quest on the market? Dragon Quest is about it for Enix's old franchises. Well, I think Star Ocean was an Enix one as well, but still, Enix had some amazing games back in the SNES days. What happened to the Soul Blazer trilogy (ish), Actraiser, or Robotrek? Square Enix has shown love to Final Fantasy, Kingdom Hearts, Mana, SaGa, Front Mission, etc. Hell, even Chrono has seen a little bit of sun since the companies have merged together. Annd I'm breaking off into a tangent again! Wooo... back to Mana discussion? Sorry, I was listening to Illusion of Gaia music while I got on, so that's prolly why I decided to go all "MUST DEFEND ENIX!" mode.DeadWolf wrote:Don't say that. Final Fantasy is slowly getting worse and that statement there shows that they want Final Fantasy to be horrible.nick912012 wrote: In a sense, Final Fantasy is trying to innovate itself, and I don't see it moving back to the traditional turn based system.
If this is the case, then the Mana series may be better of without Ishii. He was the one who kept coming up with all these wacky ideas for the franchise. It's odd to say that any series would benefit from it's creator's absence, but it seems almost like Ishii himself was the root of Mana's downfall.nick912012 wrote:Of course, this is purely speculation, and Ishii could of just been trying to make Mana into an empire like Final Fantasy is. Making it into every genre and such. Unfortunately, every single game felt underdeveloped and just the products they dished out were deadly to the series.
Yaeh, Ishii already left Square Enix, so if they do decide to bring back the franchise, I'm almost positive someone new would lead the team. Ishii did some great things back in the day, but I remember reading in one interview that Ishii's dream game was Dawn of Mana.... that's just ehhh... The idea was really cool, but it was poorly implemented and with the levels resetting after each dungeon, that's just inexcusable and lazy.The Hooded Man wrote:If this is the case, then the Mana series may be better of without Ishii. He was the one who kept coming up with all these wacky ideas for the franchise. It's odd to say that any series would benefit from it's creator's absence, but it seems almost like Ishii himself was the root of Mana's downfall.nick912012 wrote:Of course, this is purely speculation, and Ishii could of just been trying to make Mana into an empire like Final Fantasy is. Making it into every genre and such. Unfortunately, every single game felt underdeveloped and just the products they dished out were deadly to the series.